Cases 11 - 20 of 13,250
MORRIS v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2024cv00395
Respondent:
N.C. DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, N.C. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY and MARY LOCKLEAR
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tunstall v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00495
Petitioner:
Matthew Nelson Tunstall
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alward v. FCI Oxford et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Defendant:
FCI Oxford, Lt Broesch and Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02880
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Charlie Anderson, Mrs. Fripp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Matthew Budney v. SCDC Director of Prisons et al
as 6:2024cv02879
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert Budney
Defendant:
SCDC Director of Prisons, Kershaw Warden, Kershaw Grievance Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kelly v. King
as 2:2024cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jessica Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
