Cases 11 - 20 of 60
David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 20-17244
Defendant / Appellee:
M. PERRY, MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JARAMILLO, Sgt. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GETZEN
David Getzen v. County of Yavapai, et al
as 20-17242
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BLUFF, Yavapai Judge, JANE NICOLETT JONES, STOVER, Deputy, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office (YCSO) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID GETZEN
Claude Mattox, Jr. v. Craig Koenig
as 20-55985
Respondent / Appellee:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLAUDE DAVE MATTOX, Jr.
Getzen v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08065
Defendant:
Sheila Polk, Michael Bluff, Scott Mascher and others
Plaintiff:
David Getzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getzen v. Barby et al
as 3:2020cv08063
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, B Carrillo, N Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
David M Getzen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Getzen v. Yavapai, County of et al
as 3:2020cv08053
Plaintiff:
David Getzen
Defendant:
Yavapai, County of, Coconino, County of, Unknown Kimbrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claude Dave Mattox Jr. v. C. Koenig
as 2:2019cv10851
Petitioner:
Claude Dave Mattox, Jr
Respondent:
C. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cantu et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2019cv01606
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cantu, Tracy Molina and James Mattox
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Does 1-20 and Portland Police Bureau Officers and Supervisors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Michael Thomas v. Sergeant Michael Mattox et al
as 2:2019cv07560
Defendant:
Frederick W. Jackson, Police Officer James Lewis, Police Officer Kelly Sandell and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Michael Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Claude D. Mattox v. C. Koenig
as 2:2019cv06998
Petitioner:
Claude D. Mattox, Jr.
Respondent:
C. Koenig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
