Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gonzalez (PS) v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv01683
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kalma Harris, A Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Nakedwines.com et al
as 4:2022cv03900
Plaintiff:
Max Miller
Defendant:
Nakedwines.com and Naked Wines plc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Max Miller, Kimberly Miller, Barbara Gay Blaylock and others
Ethan Podry, et al v. USDC-MHE
as 18-70509
:
In re: ETHAN PODRY, JAMES COLBURN, WILLIAM HOUSTON PARRY and others
Petitioner:
ETHAN PODRY, JAMES COLBURN, WILLIAM HOUSTON PARRY and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA, HELENA
Real Party In Interest:
JAMES SALMONSON, Warden
Podry et al
as 6:2018cv00024
Petitioner:
Ethan Podry, James Colburn, William Houston Parry and others
Respondent:
Michael Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Salmonson
as 4:2018cv00032
Respondent:
James Salmonson
Petitioner:
Michael Max Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Miller v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
as 16-36037
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MAX MILLER
Respondent - Appellee:
LEROY KIRKEGARD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Woodfill et al v. Parker et al
as 4:2014cv02249
Plaintiff:
Jared R. Woodfill , Steven F Hotze , F N Williams and others
Defendant:
Annise D Parker , Anna Russell and City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Kirkegard et al
as 6:2013cv00014
Petitioner:
Michael Max Miller
Respondent:
Leroy Kirkegard and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
