Cases 31 - 40 of 41
MCDERMOTT v. PICKINS et al
as 2:2011cv07343
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MCDERMOTT
Respondent:
PICKINS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILA, PA. and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McDermott v. O'Brien
as 11-2391
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCDERMOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
STEVEN O'BRIEN, Old Colony Correctional Center Sperintendent
McDermott v. O'Brien
as 1:2009cv11992
Petitioner:
Michael McDermott
Respondent:
Steven O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
York-El et al v. United States Probation and Sentencing Office et al
as 1:2009cv02331
Petitioner:
Malachi Z. York-El
Respondent:
United States Probation and Sentencing Office, Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newton v. McDermott et al
as 5:2008hc02173
Petitioner:
Shawn Newton
Respondent:
Susan McDermott, David G. Trager and Warden Beeler
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rohan McDermott v. Tom Felker
as 2:2008cv07099
Petitioner:
Rohan McDermott
Respondent:
Tom Felker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shawn McDermott v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 08-3992
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN MCDERMOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
ROB JEFFREYS, Warden, PHILIP KERNS, Warden and JESSIE WILLIAM, Warden
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 2:2007cv01418
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, G W Bush, A Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDermott v. ROCK
as 9:2007cv00933
Petitioner:
Mark K. McDermott
Respondent:
Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McDermott v. Rock
as 9:2007cv00932
Petitioner:
Mark K. McDermott
Respondent:
Rock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
