Cases 21 - 30 of 519
Marquise Harris v. Mark Avery, et al
as 22-5538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARQUISE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK AVERY, BRANDON ROBINSON, BRIAN DAVID GOULDY and others
Rotchford v. Petraeus et al
as 2:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Defendant:
David Petraeus, Colin Powell and Raymond Odierno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotchford v. State of Washington
as 2:2022cv00727
Petitioner:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newburry #851850 v. Morrison et al
as 1:2022cv00268
Petitioner:
Steven Allen Newburry #851850
Respondent:
Bryan Morrison, Paul Stutesman, John McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders-Garcia v. McDonough
as 2:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Ray Sanders-Garcia
Defendant:
Patrick McDonough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gowan v. McDonough et al
as 2:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Julia Gowan
Defendant:
Denis R McDonough, Alyshia Smith, Michael Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harris v. Avery et al
as 3:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
Marquise Harris
Defendant:
Mark Avery, Brandon Robinson, Goldy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02828
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Ronet v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 2:2021cv01677
Plaintiff:
Jean-Pierre Ronet
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Heston Stibert, Stephen Morrison and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Oakley v. Dyer et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
Randall Wayne Oakley
Defendant:
Amanda Dyer, Cassie Coppock, Tobie Bias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
