Cases 1 - 10 of 249
In re: Young
as 22-3124
Petitioner:
In re: DONALD C. YOUNG
Respondent:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Secretary of Corrections and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
In re: Bradford
as 22-3030
Petitioner:
VIRGIL BRADFORD
Respondent:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS
Hyland v. McKunes et al
as 1:2021cv11800
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Hyland
Defendant:
Stephen McKunes, Derek Jefferson and Drew Pokrant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucero v. McKune, et al
as 19-3126
Respondent / Appellee:
STEPHEN SIX, Attorney General for the State of Kansas, ROGER WERHOLTZ, Kansas Secretary of Corrections and DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
KERRY LUCERO
In re: Mattox
as 19-3024
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL KENYATTA MATTOX
Whelthy McKune v. Dennis Bush
as 17-7539
Petitioner - Appellant:
WHELTHY MCKUNE
Respondent - Appellee:
DENNIS BUSH, Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
Nichols et al v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04071
Plaintiff:
Curtis Nichols, Avery Fortner, Wesley Johnson and others
Defendant:
Comm. Joseph Ponte, EMTC Warden Keisha Smalls, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKune v. Bush
as 8:2017cv00189
Petitioner:
Whelthy McKune
Respondent:
Dennis Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coleman v. McKune, et al
as 15-3222
Petitioner - Appellant:
RASHEEM A. COLEMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS and LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
In re: Coleman, et al
as 15-3170
Petitioner:
RASHEEM A. COLEMAN
Respondent:
DAVID R. MCKUNE, Warden, Lansing Correctional Facility, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF KANSAS and LANSING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
