Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McDonalds Corporation v. GB One, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03009
Plaintiff:
McDonalds Corporation
Defendant:
GB One, LLC and GOLDEN BEAR DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Kang v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2018cv13617
Plaintiff:
Bo Kang
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and Systems Capital Real Property Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald's Corporation v. ROGA Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv21706
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
ROGA Enterprises, Inc., James S. Feigenbaum and Shirley G. Feigenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
YIM v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv04626
Plaintiff:
IN SUN YIM
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARLIN v. MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv01176
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GENE MARLIN and MARVIN GENE MARLIN
Defendant:
MCDONALD'S CORPORATION and MCDONALD'S CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McDonald's Corporation v. Parker et al
as 1:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
Laura E Parker and Parker Family Partnership I
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Venture Leasing Co. v. McDonald's Corporation
as 5:2007cv00410
Plaintiff:
Venture Leasing Co. and Venture Leasing Co.
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McDonalds Corporation v. Rappaport et al
as 1:2007cv11397
Plaintiff:
McDonalds Corporation and McDonalds Corporation
Defendant:
Louis Rappaport and Marshall J. Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
VP 57 LLC v. McDonald's Corporation
as 1:2007cv00298
Plaintiff:
VP 57 LLC
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's Corporation
Counter Claimant:
McDonald's Corporation and McDonald's Corporation
Counter Defendant:
VP 57 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
