Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Scott v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Medical Board, Center for Disease Control and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Murrell v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General, Centurion of Arizona LLC, Kevin Currin and others
Plaintiff:
Antony T Murrell, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Arizona Medical Board
as 2:2016cv02882
Plaintiff:
Bridgette A Smith
Defendant:
Arizona Medical Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Horne et al
as 2:2013cv01079
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum
Defendant:
Tom Horne , Arizona Medical Board and Lisa Wynn
Intervenor_defendant:
William G Montgomery , Steve Montenegro and Frederick Douglass Foundation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Isaacson et al v. Horne et al
as 2:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Paul A Isaacson , William Clewell and Hugh Miller
Defendant:
Thomas C Horne , William Montgomery , Barbara Lawall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01617
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tucson Women's Center et al
as 2:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
Tucson Women's Center, Family Planning Associates, William H. Richardson, M.D. and others
Defendant:
Arizona Medical Board, Lisa Wynn and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
