Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Blackshear v. Thurston et al
as 2:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Cpt Giermoth, Cpt Welgand, Cpt Westra and others
Plaintiff:
Julian R Blackshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson, Deonte v. Van Rybrook, Greg et al
as 3:2018cv00715
Defendant:
Mel Christiansen, Sampe, Greg Van Rybrook and others
Plaintiff:
Deonte Oz Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PROXIMO DISTILLERS, LLC v. CITY OF LAWRENCEBURG et al
as 4:2018cv00124
Defendant:
LAWRENCEBURG MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, TONY ABBOTT, AARON COOK and others
Plaintiff:
PROXIMO DISTILLERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Stowe, Graham v. Van Rybroek, Gregory et al
as 3:2018cv00321
Plaintiff:
Graham L. Stowe
Defendant:
Gregory Van Rybroek , Mel Christiansen, Melissa Plumley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CTR Touring, Inc. et al v. Does 1-100 et al
as 1:2017cv02939
Plaintiff:
CTR Touring, Inc. and Chance the Rapper, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100, XYZ Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hairston et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff:
Henry Hairston , Christopher Walker , Richard Smith and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv02315
Plaintiff:
D'Mel R. Hughes
Defendant:
Tom Dart and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00332
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patterson v. Teselik et al
as 1:2014cv01253
Plaintiff:
Robert Patterson
Defendant:
Chaplain Teselik and Mel Schueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blomenkamp v. Freeburg et al
as 3:2014cv00860
Plaintiff:
John Blomenkamp
Defendant:
Village of Freeburg, Ray Danford, Dennis Herzing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
