Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Williams Hicks, et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 16-15370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAMS MICHAEL HICKS, KENNETH HARMS, as Class Representative Plaintiffs and Individual Plaintiffs, MATTHEW ACHATZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PGA TOUR, INC.
Rainey v. Dart et al
as 1:2016cv02963
Plaintiff:
Vidal Rainey
Defendant:
Reed, Smith, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11693
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Meller v. Extendicare Homes, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01487
Plaintiff:
Edward Meller
Defendant:
Extendicare Homes Inc , Extendicare Health Facility Holdings LLC , Extendicare Health Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2015cv03169
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meller et al v. Wings Over Spartanburg LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02094
Plaintiff:
David Meller and Kerstin Robinson
Defendant:
Wings Over Spartanburg LLC, Wings Over America Inc, Aetius Companies LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as MOE/4:15-cv-00540
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Scotino et al v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00540
Plaintiff:
Mary Scotino , Sheila Anderson , Ana E Calero and others
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Meller v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2014cv07447
Plaintiff:
Marian Meller
Defendant:
The City Of New York, Robert J. Youngs and Unidentified New York City Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
