Cases 1 - 10 of 1,047
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saadiq Long v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1403
Plaintiff:
SAADIQ LONG, a/k/a Paul Anderson, JUANGJAN DAVES and LESHAUNA DAVES
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR, Attorney General of the United States, in his official capacity only, CHRISTOPHER ASHER WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity only, CHARLES H. KABLE, IV, Director of the Terrorism Screening Center, in his official capacity only and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rahmani v. IRS et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Najia Rahmani
Defendant:
IRS, Paul Ferguson, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saul Posada-Martinez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
SAUL ANTONIO POSADA-MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Zahed et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
Amir Zahed and Regwida Neayish
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Acting Associate Dir Ted H. Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
