Cases 41 - 48 of 48
McIver v. Exxon Mobil Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00461
Plaintiff:
David McIver
Defendant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, MetLife Disability and Medco Health Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Poston v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2008cv00201
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Poston
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife Disability, MetLife Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Donnell v. Metlife Disability Insurance Company et al
as 7:2008cv01117
Plaintiff:
Barbara D. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Metlife Disability Insurance Company and International Business Machine Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rogers v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company-MetLife Disability
as 7:2008cv00292
Plaintiff:
Sherian W Rogers and Sherian W Rogers
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company-MetLife Disability
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Scheiman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2008cv00181
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Scheiman
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife Disability
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
RODRIGUEZ v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv03512
Plaintiff:
JOSE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE DISABILITY and HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Nelson v. MetLife Disability et al
as 0:2007cv02702
Plaintiff:
John Nelson
Defendant:
MetLife Disability, MetLife Disability, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Beaulier v. Metlife Disability
as 1:2007cv10470
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Beaulier
Defendant:
Metlife Disability, Metlife Disability, Raytheon Company and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
