Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Stewart-Richardson v. Sisley et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Corey Stewart-Richardson
Defendant:
George Sisley and Lt. Michael White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shepherd v. Saunders et al
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Kernelius Marquis Shepherd, Sr.
Defendant:
M.D. Frank Saunders, Michael White, Angela N Chevalier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04538
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WHITE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ESTATE OF DETECTIVE LAWRENCE GERRARD, ESTATE OF DETECTIVE FRANCIS MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
White v. Cunningham
as 5:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
Michael White
Defendant:
Duane Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Squires v. Jones et al
as 4:2022cv03073
Plaintiff:
Vikki Lynn Squires and Justin Michael White
Defendant:
Chris Jones, East Montgomery County Gazette, Conroe Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Shakes
as 1:2022cv01608
Petitioner:
Justin Michael White
Respondent:
No Named Respondent and David Lee Shakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. County of Will et al
as 1:2022cv02345
Plaintiff:
Dan Michael White
Defendant:
County of Will, Dale Santorelli, Mike Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. USA
as 1:2021cv00436
Petitioner:
Michael White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
WHITE v. USA
as 3:2021cv00136
Petitioner:
BRANDON MICHAEL WHITE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
White Jr. v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv02234
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael White Jr.
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Lieutenant Murphy, Officer Stollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
