Cases 1 - 10 of 146
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00758
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EUGENE NELSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NELSON v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY et al
as 1:2023cv00488
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL NELSON
Defendant:
ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, Magistrate Carter, SHERIFF SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corp. et al
as 3:2023cv20993
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nelson
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corp., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
NELSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ET AL
as 1:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PAUL NELSON
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA, SHERIFF DANNY H. ROGERS, W. GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Rockingham County et al
as 4:2023cv00704
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Nelson
Defendant:
Rockingham County, Magistrate Carter, Sheriff Samuel Scott Page and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Nelson v. Guilford County, North Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Nelson
Defendant:
Guilford County, North Carolina, Danny H Rogers, Lieutenant W Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Nelson v. Louisiana State
as 2:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Nelson
Defendant:
Louisiana State
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Michael Nelson
as 23-10010
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANDREW NELSON, AKA Michael A . Nelson
United Capital Management of Kansas, et al v. Nelson
as 23-3005
Plaintiff:
UNITED CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF KANSAS, INC. and CHAD M. KOEHN
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL E. NELSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
