Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00818
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BECK v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv03659
Plaintiff:
BECK
Defendant:
WILLIAM PELHAM BARR, JOHN G. ROBERTS, RICHARD H. KYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dannez Hunter v. Keith Rupert Murdoch, et al
as 19-2293
Defendant / Appellee:
David S. Doty, Ruben Castillo, James Rupert Murdoch and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dannez W. Hunter
DAVIS v. GERON et al
as 4:2019cv00109
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
JUSTIN CAMPBELL, JANET PAGE and TAMMY GERON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW ALBANY, INDIANA POLICE DEPT et al
as 4:2019cv00078
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
C. SHULTZ, B. KORTE and NEW ALBANY, INDIANA POLICE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW ALBANY INDIANA et al
as 4:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW ALBANY INDIANA and WALMART SUPERCENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. GRIFFIN et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
SAMANTHA GRIFFIN, SUPERIOR COURT 3 and FLOYD COUNTY INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. FLOYD COUNTY OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES et al
as 4:2019cv00086
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. DAVIS
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY OFFICE DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and CHRISTA J. PRATHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Charles J. Wilhelm, Charlene Parker, Van Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
