Cases 31 - 40 of 512
Davis v. Stephenson
as 2:2022cv12450
Petitioner:
Michael Terreal Davis
Respondent:
George Stephenson
Davis v. Appling County Detention Center
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
Appling County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Claussan et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Brian Claussan, Matt Matthews and Shannon Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Davis v. United States
as 22-2259
Petitioner / Appellant:
Michael Ray Davis
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Davis v. ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary et al
as 1:2022cv02726
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Davis
Defendant:
ATL. Fulton Co. Judiciary, Sheriffs Office, Atlanta Police Deptmt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne et al v. Davis et al
as 4:2022cv00588
Plaintiff:
Rebecca J Payne, Michael D King and James L Crowder
Defendant:
Michael C Davis, Nathan Rice and John W Staley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 5:2022cv04023
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Davis
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and Social Security Regional Administrator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
