Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Samuel Edward Hiott et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01345
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Edward Hiott, Rick Burnell Hanson, Dominick LaRocca and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Nation v. US
as 22-1256
Plaintiff:
MARK WAYNE NATION, MICHAEL JOE HORTON, KENNETH DESHAWN EDWARDS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD RODRICK MACDONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
US v. Michael Horton
as 20-4302
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY HORTON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HORTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28504
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HORTON and MICHAEL CLAUDETTE HORTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horton v. Washburn et al
as 3:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Washburn and Tennessee Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Washburn et al
as 2:2020cv00015
Defendant:
Washburn and Tennessee Department of Correction
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Horton v. Cessidey, et al
as 19-6353
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJOR CHADWELL, SHERIFF CESSIDEY and SULLIVAN COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. HORTON
Horton v. Cessidey et al
as 2:2019cv00207
Defendant:
Cessidey, Sullivan County Justice Center and Chadwell
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Horton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORTON v. WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
as 1:2018cv00151
Petitioner:
MICHAEL D. HORTON
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI MCKEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Horton v. D. Bradbury, et al
as 17-17514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. HORTON
Defendant - Appellee:
D. BRADBURY, CDW (A), M. HODGES, Appeals and SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
