Cases 31 - 40 of 228
MADDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43941
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER MADDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Shields v. Barton
as 1:2021cv00223
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander O'Shields
Defendant:
Donald Barton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Unknown
as 3:2021cv00473
Plaintiff:
Darrick Michael Alexander
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley et al v. Schuster et al
as 1:2021cv02752
Plaintiff:
Tabari-Dominique Bradley, Tiffany-Nicole Bradley and Michael-Alexander Walker
Defendant:
Stephen J Schuster, Rebecca Keaton and Joyette M Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
COTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv30450
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER COTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chana Wiley v. City of Columbus, OH, et al
as 21-3615
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHANA WILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, OH, OFFICER MICHAEL ALEXANDER, In his individual and official capacities, OFFICER RICHARD SHAFFNER, in his individual and official capacities and others
COHEN et al v. KOCH et al
as 2:2021cv11872
Plaintiff:
PROTEONOMIX, INC., MICHAEL M COHEN and ROGER FIDLER
Defendant:
VICTOR SUTHAMMANONT, TIMOTHY HALLORAN, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Michael Rivera v. Unknown
as 21-15755
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER RIVERA
BOHM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19751
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER BOHM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander et al v. Olson Property Investments, LLC
as 0:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
Patrizia Davis and Michael Alexander
Defendant:
Olson Property Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
