Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Adams et al v. Dodge et al
as 2:2021cv01289
Plaintiff:
George Adams and Elile Adams
Defendant:
Raymond Dodge, Michael Ashby, Francisco Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOYER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03158
Plaintiff:
RYAN SIMPSON, NICKLAUS NAPIER, JOHN CIFUNI and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyer et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02134
Plaintiff:
Ryan Simpson, Nicklaus Napier, John Cifuni and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Tageant v. Ashby et al
as 2:2019cv01082
Defendant:
Michael Ashby and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Carmen Tageant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ASHBY v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv00748
Respondent:
PATRICIA K. CUSHWA, CHARLES MASSARONE, UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ASHBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ashby et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv09113
Plaintiff:
Sue Ann Ashby and James Michael Ashby
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Ashby v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 0:2014cv03211
Plaintiff:
Michael Ashby
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. , Medtronic Vertelink Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Ashby v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2014cv04882
Plaintiff:
Michael Ashby
Defendant:
Does, Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and others
Melody Heather et al v. Medtronic Inc et al
as 2:2014cv01595
Plaintiff:
Michael Ashby, Richard Berube, Richard Bird and others
Defendant:
Does, Medtronic Inc, Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA Inc and others
Abner et al v. Calumet G P L L C
as 5:2012cv00669
Plaintiff:
Derrick Abner , Nathan Allen , Michael Ashby and others
Defendant:
Calumet G P L L C
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
