Cases 31 - 40 of 145
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35776
Plaintiff:
BRYAN MICHAEL BAILEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Modern Woodmen of America v. Bailey et al
as 3:2021cv02364
Plaintiff:
Modern Woodmen of America
Defendant:
Bonnie Bailey, Teresa Bailey and Michael Bailey
Cross Claimant:
Laura Dellinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jalife v. Goad et al
as 2:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Michael Bailey Goad, Tri-National, Inc. and Francisco Javier Villarreal
Plaintiff:
Mayra Berenice Meza Jalife
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00683
Defendant:
R. Oleary, Chad Adams, C/O Summers and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Chapman et al
as 3:2021cv00620
Defendant:
C. Heck, Treg Vanderkhove, Mark A. Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parra v. Finley et al
as 1:2021cv00973
Defendant:
Michael Bailey, Scott Finley and Mr. Radle
Plaintiff:
Jorge Parra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01973
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Ruiz v. William Barr, et al
as 21-15301
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTY, named as Joe Doe, United States Assistant Attorney General for the District of Arizona "Tucson", RAMIRO S. FLORES, named as Federal Public Defender, LYNNETTE C. KIMMINS, U.S. Magistrate Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona "Tucson" and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN MORENO RUIZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
