Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Bowles v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv30524
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowles
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC and Steve Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
White et al v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
Danielle M White, John No. 1 Doe and John No. 2 Doe
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Steve Burns, Tennessee Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01736
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowling
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowling v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as KYW/3:14-cv-00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowling
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Bowling v. Zimmer Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowling
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc. , Zimmer Holdings, Inc. and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Gleason et al
as 5:2013cv04142
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
DeeAnna Beth Gleason, Kansas Housing Resources Corporation and Michael Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Michael Bowling v. Ronald Barne
as 13-56073
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL BOWLING
Respondent - Appellee:
RONALD BARNES
Bowles et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael Bowles , Chelsea Bowles and M&C Wholesale
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
