Cases 111 - 120 of 505
Crawford v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Antonio Crawford
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schexnayder v. Carvajal et al
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ashdon Schexnayder
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal and Catricia Howard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramdeo v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02013
Petitioner:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn, Warden Stephen Spaulding, Nicole C. English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenny Bruns, et al v. USAA, et al
as 22-5011
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jenny Bruns and Jeremy Bruns
Defendant / Appellee:
USAA, Reuben F. Young, Robert N. Hunter, Jr. and others
Calhoun v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Chad Calhoun
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutter v. Garland et al
as 5:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shawn Louis Sutter
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland, Michael Carvajal, Warden S. Salmonson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McRae v. Lockett et al
as 4:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Andre McRae
Defendant:
Charles Lockett, Michael Carvajal, Gene Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watlington v. Carvajal
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Daniel Watlington
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022cv03005
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Carvajal, James Devere and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
