Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv62505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02390
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniel v. Dickerson et al
as 3:2026cv01091
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniel
Defendant:
Sergeant Dickerson, Ms. S, C/O Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANIELS v. WARDEN
as 1:2026cv01682
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DANIELS, II
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. DIAZ AGUILAR et al
as 0:2026cv61984
Defendant:
JUAN ROBERTO DIAZ AGUILAR and MICHAEL DANIEL BALDINO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Daniel v. Harrison County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2026cv00500
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Daniel
Defendant:
Harrison County Sheriff Department and Demisha Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniels et al v. Shult et al
as 3:2026cv02033
Plaintiff:
Michael Daniels and Delon Daniels
Defendant:
Ray Shult, Penske Truck Leasing Co LP and MVT Services LLC doing business as Melissa Valley Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Campa et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 5:2026cv03498
Plaintiff:
Tawny Campa, Alahyo Young, Alan MacGavin and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Michael Midgett v. Securities and Exchange Commission
as 26-10501
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DANIEL MIDGETT
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
