Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Gaines v. James et al
as 4:2019cv04514
Defendant:
James Olah, American Keystone Engineering & Automation Corp., Olah James and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gaines, dba MG Solutions and Michael Gaines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Gaines v. James Whitley
as 19-7015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GAINES
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES F. WHITLEY, Superintendent
Christopher Gaines v. Mary Smith
as 19-6778
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY C. SMITH, MD Director
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GAINES
Gaines v. Smith
as 7:2019cv00248
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Gaines
Defendant:
Mary C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00741
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Gaines v. Whitley
as 7:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Gaines
Defendant:
James F. Whitley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaines v. Nassau University Medical Center
as 2:2018cv02109
Plaintiff:
Michael Gaines
Defendant:
Nassau University Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GAITER et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 0:2016cv62755
Plaintiff:
Tony Gaiter , Sedrick Irvin , KEVIN HARRIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, MINNESOTA VIKINGS FOOTBALL CLUB, LLC, MIAMI DOLPHINS, LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaines v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv12793
Plaintiff:
Michael Gaines
Defendant:
COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Alan Greenberg v. Chester Downs and Marina LLC, et al
as 16-1785
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALAN GREENBERG
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESTER DOWNS AND MARINA LLC, Harrahs Philadelphia, MICHAEL GAINES, Individually in his capacity as corporal for the Pennsylvania State Police and WILLIAM SHORES, Individually in his official capacity as trooper for the Pennsylvania State Police
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
