Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Phillip Giles v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7082
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Petitioner:
PHILLIP MICHAEL GILES
Phillip Giles v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-7008
Petitioner:
PHILLIP MICHAEL GILES
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON
Williams v. Recovery Innovations Inc et al
as 3:2024cv05496
Defendant:
Michael Giles and Recovery Innovations Inc
Plaintiff:
Tyajah Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Santistevan v. Thompson et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jerry Santistevan
Defendant:
Megan Thompson, Michael Giles, Stefany Miley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Giles
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GILES
as 2:2023cv03109
Defendant:
MICHAEL GILES and MUVEY GILES EL
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. GILES
as 2:2022cv06533
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL GILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Giles v. Warden Watson
as 3:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Brodrick Michael Giles
Defendant:
Canton Police Department and Warden Unknown Watson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Infinite Master Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2022cv00943
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic and Jesse Jerome Pointer
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Arlene Heshmati, Steven B. Wolfson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GILES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv05902
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GILES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
