Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Harris v. FRANKLIN MINT FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
as 1:2023cv12891
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Franklin Mint Federal Credit Union
IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2023md03083
Plaintiff:
Shavonne Diggs, Brady Bradberry, Christina Bradberry and others
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation, Maximus Federal Services, Inc., The Berwyn Group, Inc. and others
Harris v. Progress Software Corporation
as 1:2023cv11816
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bacon v. Tompkins, et al
as 19-1926
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL HARRIS, Superintendent Suffolk County, EUGENE SUMPTER, Special Sheriff Nashua Jail, BRITNEY CARROL, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BACON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10523
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Winston v. Olivera et al
as 1:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Winston
Defendant:
Tony Olivera, Josephine Bird, Briann Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv30184
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harris et al v. Norris et al
as 1:2013cv12275
Plaintiff:
Paula Harris , Michael Harris and Seanna Harris
Defendant:
Timothy Norris , John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Northern Insurance Company of New York a/s/o Pain d'Avignon v. AGA Foodservice, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv11089
Plaintiff:
Northern Insurance Company of New York a/s/o Pain d'Avignon
Defendant:
AGA Foodservice, Inc., FBM Baking Machines and Michael Harris-Warren
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
