Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Geneva Enterprises, LLC et al v. Chavez et al
as 1:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Geneva Enterprises, LLC and AV Automotive, LLC
Defendant:
Aaron Chavez, Alex Guevara, Ana Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Caldwell et al v. Duncanville Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv02198
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE CALDWELL, LARRY MICHAEL HOOK and AJUA YVETTE MASON
Defendant:
Duncanville Police Department, SERGEANT D. YOUNTS, OFFICER PINEDA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Andre, et al v. Clayton County, Georgia, et al
as 23-13253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC ANDRE and CLAYTON ENGLISH
Defendant / Appellee:
CLAYTON COUNTY, GEORGIA, KEVIN ROBERTS, CLAYTON COUNTY and others
Morgan v. Hook et al
as 3:2022cv01918
Plaintiff:
Traci Morgan
Defendant:
Aaron Michael Hook, Professional Installers, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Andr et al v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv04065
Plaintiff:
Eric Andre and Clayton English
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Kevin Roberts, Aimee Branham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Hook et al
as 3:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Traci Morgan
Defendant:
Aaron Michael Hook and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Hooks v. Davis et al
as 1:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Michael Hooks
Defendant:
Mark Davis, Scott DeLeerda and John . Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Hardin County Jail
as 1:2020cv00147
Petitioner:
Michael Hooks
Respondent:
Hardin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hooks v. Penisiky et al
as 1:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Scott Delacerda, Sabrina Mangum and Jack Penisiky
Plaintiff:
Michael Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hook v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00040
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Hook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
