Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CARROLL v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2022cv00523
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
USA v. Michael Carroll
as 20-35814
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL, tobor11313@yahoo.com
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
RYDER v. WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00248
Respondent:
MICHAEL J CARROLL, CHRISTOPHER V SALERNO, WELLS FARGO CLEARING SERVICES LLC and others
Petitioner:
ROBERT F. RYDER
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
USA v. Michael Carroll
as 19-30053
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL, AKA tobor11313@yahoo.com
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Carroll
as 3:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael J. Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carroll v. Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv02281
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Carroll
Defendant:
Peoples Benefit Life Insurance Company , Monumental Life Insurance Company and TransAmerica Premier Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Michael Carroll
as 14-30117
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CARROLL, AKA tobor11313@yahoo.com
Rondeau v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rondeau
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Mark W. Everson, NH Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rondeau v. US Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2007cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rondeau
Defendant:
US Internal Revenue Service, Mark A. Everson, NH Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RONDEAU v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2007cv00897
Plaintiff:
KEVIN RONDEAU
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, MARK W. EVERSON, NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
