Cases 71 - 80 of 1,087
Michael HarrellIn re: Michael Harrell
as 23-11634
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL JAMES HARRELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cody et al v. Twin Rivers Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00568
Plaintiff:
julie ann cody and Regina Cody
Defendant:
Twin Rivers Trucking, LLC and Michael James Crews
Not Classified By Court:
Penny W. Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
COYLE v. BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION, INC
as 3:2023cv09956
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES COYLE
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC, BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY, TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brooks v. Gutierrez
as 23-50323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael James Brooks
Defendant / Appellee:
David Gutierrez
Home Forward v. Home Forward LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00672
Plaintiff:
Home Forward
Defendant:
Michael James and Home Forward LLC doing business as Home Forward
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Duke Manufacturing Company v. Andrus
as 3:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Duke Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Michael James Andrus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Lingenfelter v. Bank of England
as 3:2023cv00775
Plaintiff:
Michael James Lingenfelter
Defendant:
Bank of England
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 w Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
US v. Michael Taylor
as 23-6389
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JAMES TAYLOR
(SS) Sakane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Michael James Sakane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CONLEY v. HEARD et al
as 1:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
KARRI MICHELLE CONLEY
Defendant:
DAVID LEE HEARD, ROBERT SEAN HOLDAWAY, SR, SALVATORE MIRANTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
