Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kay v. Chestnut
as 2:2023cv00896
Petitioner:
Michael Kay
Respondent:
Christopher Chestnut and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KAYS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KAYS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kay et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03831
Plaintiff:
Michael Kay and Claudia Kay
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eric Michael Kay v. Andrew Saul
as 8:2020cv01507
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Kay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
KAYS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv13675
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KAYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13686
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kay v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01002
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Kay
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kay v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02513
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Kay
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Kop et al v. Department of Land and Natural Resources et al
as 1:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Michael Kai Kop and Sylvia Janet Kop
Defendant:
Department of Land and Natural Resources and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
