Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Kinney et al
as 3:2020cv01354
Defendant:
Richard Turner, David Kinney, Judge Marilyn Huff and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCloskey v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01053
Defendant:
Getinge AB, Atrium Medical Corporation and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Washington v. Kevin Doran, et al
as 16-1026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN DORAN, BRIAN JAMES, AL SERVELLO, Unit Manager and others
In re: Michael McCloskey
as 14-2816
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
WASHINGTON v. DORAN et al
as 2:2013cv00277
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WASHINGTON
Defendant:
KAAS DORAN, MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY, JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Doran et al
as 3:2013cv00246
Plaintiff:
Robert Washington
Defendant:
Kaas Doran, Michael McCloskey, James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLOSKEY v. White et al
as 3:2009cv01273
Defendant:
Thomas White, JOHN DOE and VILLAGE OF OTTAWA HILLS, OHIO
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Michael McCloskey v. Robert Shannon, et al
as 09-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT SHANNON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
In re: Michael McCloskey v. Robert Shannon, et al
as 08-4813
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY
Defendant - Respondent:
ROBERT SHANNON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
MCCLOSKEY v. SHANNON et al
as 2:2008cv05409
Petitioner:
MICHAEL MCCLOSKEY
Respondent:
ROBERT SHANNON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
