Cases 11 - 20 of 30
McGowan v. Klein et al
as 1:2018cv01518
Petitioner:
Michael McGowan
Respondent:
P. Klein and Christopher Synsvoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McGowan v. Capital One Services, LLC
as 0:2018cv60747
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Capital One Services, LLC and Capital One Bank (USA) N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Asotin County et al
as 2:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Stephen R Jackson, Sr
Defendant:
Asotin County , Asotin County Sheriff's Department , John Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGowan v. Fox et al
as 1:2017cv01989
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Jack Fox, Resto, S. Beicker-Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donohue v. The Village of Hempstead et al
as 2:2017cv03870
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Donohue
Defendant:
Michael McGowan, The Village of Hempstead and Joseph Wing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGowan v. Epps et al
as 4:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Marshal Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGowan v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
as 3:2016cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Downes et al
as 2:2014cv01256
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Darlene Rae Downes , Jeffra Mcgowan and Michael Mcgowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
FOUNTAINE et al v. CORPORATION MCKESSON et al
as 2:2014cv02020
Plaintiff:
JAMES LA FOUNTAINE , EARL LAYNE , DANIEL LEBLANC and others
Defendant:
CORPORATION MCKESSON and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McGowan v. Harrington et al
as 3:2014cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael McGowan
Defendant:
R Shearing and Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
