Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02837
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Harper et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Carl J Harper, Leon Guy Patterson, Sr, Wayne Earl Paul and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
PERRYMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00892
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
PERRYMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19593
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perryman v. LeMaster et al
as 0:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Michael Perryman
Defendant:
Mr. LeMaster, Morman, Butcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRYMAN v. USA
as 1:2022cv00889
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Perryman v. Pritchett (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00709
Defendant:
Sonja Pritchett
Plaintiff:
John Michael Perryman, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perryman v. Pritchett (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00702
Defendant:
Sonja Pritchett
Plaintiff:
John Michael Perryman, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERRYMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68796
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PERRYMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23835
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PERRYMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
