Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Carey, Timothy et al v. Wisconsin Elections Commission et al
as 3:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Timothy Carey, Martha Chambers, Scott Luber and others
Defendant:
Wisconsin Elections Commission and Meagan Wolfe
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Aguilera v. Kyle
as 3:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
C Gonzalez-Aguilera
Defendant:
Michael Reece, L.R. Kyle, Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowell v. Johnson County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Dowell
Defendant:
Johnson County, Tennessee, Michael Reece, Joe Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Dunn et al
as 2:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hubert Taylor and Carolyn Sue Taylor
Defendant:
Amy Dunn, Barbara Hathaway, Johnson County, Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor et al v. Johnson County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2011cv00029
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hubert Taylor and Carolyn Sue Taylor
Defendant:
Johnson County, Tennessee, Michael Reece, Edward Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed et al v. Haney et al
as 5:2010cv00288
Plaintiff:
Greg Reed , Dustin Brumley , Justin Murray and others
Defendant:
Steve Haney, Sergeant Harris, Lieutenant Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathaniel Hatchett v. City of Detroit, et al
as 10-1718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL MAURICE HATCHETT
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF MACOMB and others
Reece v. Arizona, State of et al
as 3:2009cv08191
Petitioner:
James Michael Reece
Respondent:
Arizona, State of and Arizona Attorney General, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hatchett v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2008cv11864
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Maurice Hatchett
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Sterling Heights, City of, Macomb County and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
