Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Pearce v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Pearce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wood v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Wood
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clayton v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Clayton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Clayton v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Clayton
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Pearce v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Pearce
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STOLTZ v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00873
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANE STOLTZ
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Moore v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2018cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Moore
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Griggs v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00422
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Griggs
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COBB v. BERRYHILL et al
as 1:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANE COBB
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2017cv00489
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Freeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.