Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Stacey v. Monroe County Detention Center Medical Services et al
as 4:2022cv10072
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center Medical Services and Monroe County Detention Center Dental Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Stacey v. Katz et al
as 4:2021cv10101
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Defendant:
Sgt. Katz, Lt. Crane, Monroe County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OZIER v. CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
KELVIN OZIER
Defendant:
INDIANA CITY OF JEFFERSONVILLE, NIKOLAI BOYAR, Chief KENNY KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. Monroe County Detention Center
as 4:2021cv10045
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. Ms. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv10187
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center, Captain Crane, C.C.S Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv10157
Defendant:
Bicwn, Salters, Emanuel and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. Monroe County Sheriff's Department
as 4:2019cv10033
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. Monroe County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv10270
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Stacey
Defendant:
Monroe County Detention Center, Sheriff Rick Ramsay, Does 4-20 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrell v. Small et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00652
Plaintiff:
George Edward Jarrell
Defendant:
Phillip Small and Michael Stacey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacey v. USA
as 3:2012cv00534
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Stacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
