Cases 41 - 50 of 274
Murray Hooper v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 22-16764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MURRAY HOOPER
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, of Arizona and MICHAEL SULLIVAN, Interim Police Chief, City of Phoenix
Dickerson v. Doe et al
as 3:2022cv03184
Plaintiff:
Samuel Dickerson
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Michael Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fischer et al v. Thomas et al
as 2:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fischer, Fischer for Supreme Court Committee and Robert A. Winter, Jr.
Defendant:
Hon. Karen A. Thomas, Hon. R. Michael Sullivan, Hon. Eddy Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20522
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marks v. Precythe, et al.
as 6:2022cv03220
Plaintiff:
Wesley Everette Marks
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, LaDonna M Buckner, Billy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv03127
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sullivan et al v. Sarasota County, Florida
as 8:2022cv01605
Plaintiff:
Michael Sullivan, William Schreiner, Travis Dagenais and others
Defendant:
SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14423
Plaintiff:
PATRICK MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SULLIVAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12597
Plaintiff:
SEAN MICHAEL SULLIVAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams #124345 v. Yuma, County of et al
as 2:2022cv01118
Plaintiff:
DaJuan Torrell Williams
Defendant:
W Walker, Martha Dominguez, Unknown Russom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
