Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Amesbury v. Burnes, et al
as 23-1077
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK E. AMESBURY, d/b/a Polytechnic
Defendant / Appellee: HANNAH BURNES, RI State Fire Marshal, Investigator, DAVID GOLDSTEIN, Chief Fire Marshal, DONALD R. GREBIEN, Mayor and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Happle v. Sweeney et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01612
Plaintiff: Thomas Martin-Happle and Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Michael Sweeney, Jack McNiff, Paul Margiotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01808
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Sweeney v. CGA Capital Management LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00385
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Greer and Michael Sweeney
Defendant: CGA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC and Alwyn Nartey
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02848
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Happle v. Sweeny
as 1:2022cv01186
Plaintiff: :thomas-martin; .happle: and Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant: Officer Michael Sweeny and Michael Sweeney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wheatley v. Boardman Township et al
as 4:2022cv01439
Plaintiff: Tiffany D. Wheatley
Defendant: Boardman Township, Mahoning County Court #2, Judge Joseph M. Houser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amesbury v. Burnes et al
as 1:2022cv00255
Plaintiff: Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytecnic
Defendant: Hannah Burnes, David Goldstein, Donald Grebien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01515
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?