Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Whitaker v. Dept. of Corrections
as 1:2019cv03263
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitaker
Defendant:
Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv05168
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Whitaker v. Sprayberry et al
as 4:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Mrs. Hammock-Evans, Mrs. Manning, Dr. Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitaker v. Sprayberry et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Defendant:
Mrs. Hammock-Evans, Mrs. Manning, Dr. Eugene and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brim et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00841
Plaintiff:
Felix Brim , Eric Hudson , Kurt Williams and others
Defendant:
Combe, Incoprated , Combe Incorporated , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caceres et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2016cv01949
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Caceres, Tony Walton, Lisa Santo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Whitaker v. Steele
as 4:2011cv00327
Petitioner:
Michael Whitaker
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowman et al v. Whitaker et al
as 5:2010cv01603
Plaintiff:
Charles E Lowman, Robert A Lowman and Juanita Neal Lowman
Defendant:
Jerry Whitaker Timber L L C, Michael Whitaker, Ricky Whitaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chesapeake Louisiana L P v. H T P & Associates L L C et al
as 5:2010cv00374
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Louisiana L P
Defendant:
H T P & Associates L L C, Deborah Whitaker Turner, Carol Whitaker Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
