Cases 1 - 10 of 1,113
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01514
Petitioner:
Michael William Davis
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Brown (Bailey)
as 24-1037
Defendant:
LORENZO BAILEY, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01831
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Brown (Agoro)
as 24-984
Defendant:
OLUWAGBENGA AGORO, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Nicholas Evangelides, Dale Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hawkins v. North Central Regional Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael William Hawkins
Defendant:
North Central Regional Jail and Captain Sams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Brown (Battice)
as 24-884
Defendant:
QUINCY BATTICE, DAVON BROWN, CHRISTIAN WILLIAMS and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Glasgow v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Shannon M Glasgow
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Local Officials, Federal Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrales et al v. Ghost Beverages LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01185
Plaintiff:
Tinamarie Barrales and Michael Williams
Defendant:
Ghost Beverages LLC and Mondelez International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
