Cases 1 - 10 of 15
KENNEY v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
WALTER LAWRENCE KENNEY
Defendant:
GDC COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER, WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, DR MICHAEL WOODARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Woodard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WOODARD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02668
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MICHAEL WOODARD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woodard et al v. American National Property and Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv00156
Plaintiff:
Michael Woodard and Zina Woodard
Defendant:
American National Property and Casualty Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv02560
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Woodard v. Florida Commercial Care, Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02772
Defendant:
Florida Commercial Care, Inc. and Stephen McDowell
Plaintiff:
Michael Woodard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ryan Miner
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Giles County Sheriff's Department, Michael Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Baugh et al
as 1:2016cv00906
Plaintiff:
Laurie Ann Smith
Defendant:
Adrian Baugh, George Brown, Michael Woodard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nelson v. Wade et al
as 2:2014cv14483
Petitioner:
Frank Nelson
Respondent:
Dattahn Wade, Darren Long, City of Detroit Police Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
