Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Donald Friedman, et al v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc. USA, et al
as 23-11908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD FRIEDMAN, LORI REYNOLDS, WILLIAM PAUL REYNOLDS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. USA, MARLENE GOLDENBERG, APOTEX CORP. and others
Bryant v. Talbot Clinical Services of Ohio, LLC
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michele Bryant
Defendant:
Talbot Clinical Services of Ohio, LLC aka and/or dba Talbot Health Services and Talbot Clinical Services of Ohio, LLC doing business as Talbot Health Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Bryant v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00979
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryant v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv02524
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Michelle Bryant
as 20-6354
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHELLE BRYANT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRYANT v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 9:2020cv80355
Plaintiff:
APRIL MICHELLE BRYANT
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline P.L.C. and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRYANT v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00057
Plaintiff:
APRIL MICHELLE BRYANT
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC and BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bryant v. USA
as 4:2019cv02692
Petitioner:
Michelle Bryant
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Michelle Bryant
as 19-4141
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHELLE BRYANT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bryant v. Gate Maintenance, LLC
as 2:2018cv02354
Defendant:
Gate Maintenance, LLC. and Gate Maintenance, LLC
Plaintiff:
Ms. Michelle Bryant and Michelle Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
