Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
RYAN v. HILL
as 1:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
MICHELE RYAN
Defendant:
RICHARD HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ryan v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08928
Plaintiff:
Sanofi US Services Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and Michelle Ryan
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan et al v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv09152
Plaintiff:
Michele Ryan and Glynn Ryan
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cartrett et al v. East West Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02975
Plaintiff:
Rachel Cartrett and Michelle Ryans
Defendant:
East West Hospitality LLC, Emory Hospitality LLC and Parash Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Bonin et al v. Sabine River Authority of Texas
as 1:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Perry Bonin , Ace Chandler , Michael . Manuel and others
Defendant:
Sabine River Authority of Texas and Sabine River Authority of Louisiana
Respondent:
Judy Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pendleton et al v. Good Choice Preservation, LLC
as 8:2016cv01077
Plaintiff:
Erik Pendleton and Michelle Ryan
Defendant:
Good Choice Preservation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ryan v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Mary Michelle Ryan
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Ryan v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv06933
Plaintiff:
Connie Michelle Ryan
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2013cv01456
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ryan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
