Cases 41 - 50 of 2,130
Hafeman v. Google LLC
as 24-1603
Appellant:
CAROLYN W. HAFEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Hafeman v. Google LLC
as 24-1604
Appellant:
CAROLYN W. HAFEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Hafeman v. Google LLC
as 24-1605
Appellant:
CAROLYN W. HAFEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Hafeman v. Google LLC
as 24-1602
Appellant:
CAROLYN W. HAFEMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
GOOGLE LLC and MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Flick Intelligence, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 6:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Flick Intelligence, LLC
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strege v. Gmail-Google, et al
as 24-2012
Plaintiff:
ADAM STREGE
Defendant:
GMAIL-GOOGLE, NEWFOLD DIGITAL, 80 Website Hosting Companies, SPAM TITAN, Titanhq.com and others
A.S. v. OpenAI LP et al
as 3:2024cv01190
Plaintiff:
A.S.
Defendant:
OpenAI LP, OpenAI Incorporated, OpenAI GP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Donerson v. Epic Games Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00041
Defendant:
Rockstar Games UK Ltd, Epic Games Inc, Activision Blizzard Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kushanel Donerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Manning vs Microsoft Inc, et al
as 6:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Author J. Manning, Jr.
Defendant:
Microsoft Inc, Bill Gates, Nintendo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Basbanes et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Basbanes, Nicholas Ngagoyeanes and Nicholas A. Basbanes
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, OpenAI, Inc., OpenAI GP, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Jonathan Alter and Authors Guild
Cross Plaintiff:
Paul Tremblay, MICHAEL CHABON, TA-NEHISI COATES and others
Cross Defendant:
DAVID HENRY HWANG
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
