Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Eskenasy v. LinkedIn Corporation et al
as 5:2026cv06047
Plaintiff:
Michael Eskenasy
Defendant:
LinkedIn Corporation and Microsoft Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Fleharty v. Google Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv01613
Plaintiff:
Brian Wayne Fleharty
Defendant:
Google Inc., Apple Inc., Meta Platform Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thompson v. Citigroup Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00414
Plaintiff:
Carmen Thompson
Defendant:
Citigroup Inc., HNA Group Co, Ltd, Hainan Airlines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Veleber v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 4:2026cv03299
Plaintiff:
Monica Veleber and Sarah Merkavah
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Microsoft Corp., Anthropic PBC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
THOMPSON v. CITIGROUP INC. et al
as 2:2026cv02270
Plaintiff:
CARMEN MARIE THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITIGROUP INC., GROUP-HAINAN AIRLINES (HOLDING CO.), MICROSOFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Microsoft Corp.
as 3:2026cv02483
Plaintiff:
Eugene Hart, Jr.
Defendant:
Microsoft Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Haden Yonce v. OpenAI LP, et al
as 26-1577
Plaintiff:
HADEN CHRISTIAN YONCE
Defendant:
ANTHROPIC PBC, GOOGLE LLC, META PLATFORMS INC and others
In re: Haden Yonce
as 25-3298
Petitioner:
In re: HADEN CHRISTIAN YONCE
Respondent:
OPENAI LP, ANTHROPIC PBC, MICROSOFT CORP and others
Armstrong v. US Federal Government et al
as 4:2025cv04194
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
US Federal Government, Federal Supreme Court of The United States, Rock Island Division of the Central District Court of Central Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chandler v. Epic Games, Inc. et al
as CAN/3:25-cv-06877
Plaintiff:
Sumeka Chandler
Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Microsoft Corp., Mojang Studios and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
