Cases 1 - 10 of 15
TX Tribune v. Caldwell County
as 24-50135
Plaintiff:
Texas Tribune, Mano Amiga and Caldwell/Hays Examiner
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Texas, Trey Hicks, in his official capacity as Caldwell County Court at Law Judge and Caldwell County Magistrate, Matt Kiely, in his official capacity as Caldwell County Justice of the Peace and Caldwell County Magistrate and others
Texas Tribune et al v. Caldwell County, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Texas Tribune, Mano Amiga and Caldwell/Hays Examiner
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Texas, Trey Hicks, Matt Kiely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brannen et al v. City of Jesup, Georgia et al
as 2:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
Rachel Brannen, Jason LaRoche, Matthew LaRoche and others
Defendant:
City of Jesup, Georgia, Mike Lane, Ray Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1430
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Chandler v. Lane
as 1:2022cv00404
Petitioner:
Timothy L. Chandler
Respondent:
Mike Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Carter v. Lane
as 1:2022cv00020
Petitioner:
Dennis Edwards Carter
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carter v. Lane
as 6:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Dennis Edwards Carter
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. City of Jesup, Georgia et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
Mike Lane and City of Jesup, Georgia
Plaintiff:
Cody Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
