Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Calva-Garcia v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2022cv01478
Plaintiff:
Rosa Elena Calva-Garcia
Defendant:
City of San Diego, Kelly S. Stewart, Andres Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Rogers v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government et al
as 1:2021cv00220
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Charles Rogers
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government, Deputy Nathan Fountain, Deputy Carl Glenn Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Hamilton County, Tennessee, Government et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Deputy Mike Mullins, John Doe, Deputy Nathan Fountain and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Charles Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DE SAPIO PROPERTIES #SIX, INC. et al v. ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2016cv05770
Plaintiff:
DE SAPIO PROPERTIES #SIX, INC. and DELAWARE RIVER TUBING, INC.
Defendant:
ALEXANDRIA TOWNSHIP , R. CHRISTIAN PFEFFERLE , PAUL ABRAHAM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Jones, et al
as 16-6254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS RUSELL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, MARK KNUTSON, Directors Designee, WARDEN MIKE MULLIN, Warden for the Jess Dunn Correctional Facility Oklahoma Department of corrections and others
Good v. Mullins
as 7:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Olen Good, Jr.
Defendant:
Mike Mullins
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Miller v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Marcus Rusell Miller
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Mark Knutson, Mike Mullin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kibbe v. Mullin et al
as 5:2014cv00882
Petitioner:
Cristopher L Kibbe
Respondent:
Mike Mullin and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
