Cases 11 - 20 of 1,415
Larry v. Mims
as 4:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Julius James Larry, IV
Respondent:
Charles M Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Venable v. Supreme Court of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Demetric Markie Venable
Defendant:
Supreme Court of Virginia, Honorable S. Bernard Goodwyn, Honorable D. Arthur Kelsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Mims
as 1:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Shawn Lockhart
Respondent:
Warden Charles Mims
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mims v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65079
Plaintiff:
Brenda D Mims
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heard v. Stateville NRC et al
as 1:2024cv02217
Plaintiff:
Eric T. Heard
Defendant:
Stateville NRC, Hill, Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIMS v. GRAY et al
as 2:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
HAABIYL MIMS
Defendant:
VICE ADMIRAL CHRISTOPHER S. GRAY, CARLOS DEL TORO, CAPTAIN JOSEPH DARCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Payne v. Employs at CCDOC et al
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
Employs at CCDOC, Mims, Briggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
