Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Miller v. Marshall et al
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Andrew T. Miller
Defendant:
William K. Marshall, Medina Prue, Leslie Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Liberty Healthcare Services, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv03132
Plaintiff:
Misti Adams
Defendant:
Liberty Healthcare Services, LLC, Liberty Healthcare Services, LLC Plus, Chanthou Phay and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
BAY v. CRAIG et al
as 4:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
EDWARD R BAY
Defendant:
SAM CRAIG, BRANDON WOODWARD and MISTY ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbogast v. Maston et al
as 3:2020cv00230
Defendant:
Unit Manager Jack Stollings, Don Spingston, Steven Kalinofski and others
Plaintiff:
John F. Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arbogast v. Jividen et al
as 5:2020cv00251
Defendant:
Jeremy Metz, C.O. Buzzart, Dan Kimble and others
Plaintiff:
John Arbogast
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Sandy et al
as 2:2020cv00656
Defendant:
Steven Kolinofski, Paul Gordon, David Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wooten v. St. Marys Correctional Center et al
as 2:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Denver Wooten
Defendant:
St. Marys Correctional Center, Patrick Mirandy, John Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Central Ohio Elderly Care, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
Misti Adams
Defendant:
Central Ohio Elderly Care, LLC , Central Ohio Elderly Care Plus, LLC and Osman Hassan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14610
Plaintiff:
Misty Adams and Daryl Adams
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arbogast v. Northern District Court et al
as 5:2014cv00001
Petitioner:
John Franklin Arbogast
Respondent:
Northern District Court, St. Mary's Correctional Center, Patrick Mirandy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
