Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Wilson v. Steelton & Highspire Railroad et al
as 1:2021cv00420
Defendant:
Arcelor-Mittal USA, Inc., BD Highspire Holdings, LLC, Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Wilson
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Mott v. Mittal Steel et al
as 4:2017cv02495
Plaintiff:
Terrence Mott
Defendant:
Mittal Steel, Targa Resources, M.D. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Timothy Hodum v. Mittal Steel USA Inc
as 2:2014cv00006
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Hodum
Defendant:
Mittal Steel USA Inc and ARCELOR MITTAL BURNS HARBOR LLC improperly sued as MITTAL STEEL USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mittal Steel USA, Inc. v. Pekron Consulting, Inc., et al
as 13-2962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MITTAL STEEL USA, INCORPORATED, also known as Arcelor Mittal Steel USA, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee:
HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-561
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02866
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Hernandez v. Mittal Steel USA - Railways Inc
as 2:2010cv00312
Plaintiff:
Michael Hernandez
Defendant:
Mittal Steel USA - Railways Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Warner v. Arcelor Mittal Steel
as 2:2010cv00251
Plaintiff:
Stacy L Warner
Defendant:
Arcelor Mittal Steel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Castillo et al v. Arcelormittal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jose Castillo and Joanna Castillo
Defendant:
Arcelormittal USA, Inc., Mittal Steel USA, Inc., Mittal Steel U.S.A. - Venture, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
